“I do not like my school, since the teachers beat me badly”: how corporal punishment makes children feel

by Virginia Morrow

Ginny cropped_low-res

One of the success stories of the Millennium Development Goals has been the increase in enrolment of children in primary schools. However, little attention has been paid to the daily experiences of children in school, from their viewpoints, and the role corporal punishment plays in those experiences.

Corporal punishment is widely used in schools globally despite international concern about the effects on children and the implications for their capacity to benefit from school.  And yet it persists. Changing social policies send clear messages about practices that are not acceptable, but the eradication of corporal punishment in schools globally is proving difficult, and India is no exception.

Violence against girls is now high on the Indian political agenda, after the horrific fatal gang rape of a female student in Delhi in 2012 led to widespread demonstrations demanding an end to sexual violence against girls and women.

However,  more ‘normal’ forms of violence may go unnoticed or unquestioned, and limited academic attention has focussed on children, and how patriarchy leads to gendered differences in the way boys and girls are treated at home, school and society at large. Social divisions based on caste, class and socio-economic status remain predominant, and violence against the powerless by those in power is common. This extends to schools where teachers ‘control’ the students through corporal punishment. For children in Andhra Pradesh, norms relating to femininity mean that girls are required to be docile and submissive, and not to be ‘caught’ being ‘naughty’. Norms of/or ideas about masculinity may mean that boys are supposed to be able to accept physical punishment and to withstand pain.

This week sees the launch of a book entitled Gender Violence in Poverty Contexts – the educational challenge edited by Jenny Parkes. Chapter 5, Children’s perceptions of punishment in schools in Andhra Pradesh, India by myself and Renu Singh presents research evidence from Young Lives about the prevalence of school corporal punishment among a sample of children in Andhra Pradesh.

Our findings indicate that corporal punishment of children in schools is endemic.

India ratified the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1992, and has copious policies that ban corporal punishment in schools. But these seem out of kilter with everyday realities. The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act of 2009 guarantees school for all children between the ages of 6 and 14. Elementary schooling has expanded but this rapid expansion has not been matched by comparable increases in the teaching workforce. There is a shortage of teachers in government schools, and class sizes are very large, putting pressure on teachers to control high numbers of children, in both the private and the government sector.

The Government of India commissioned research that included over 3,000 children aged from 5 to 18, who were asked about physical abuse by teachers. In all age groups, 65% reported being beaten at school.  Overall, the Young Lives findings reinforce these figures.

Our younger cohorts (7-8 year old) were significantly more likely to have witnessed and experienced corporal punishment than the 14-15 year old cohort, with over two-thirds of the younger children having been physically punished at school in the past week, compared with one-third of the older young people. Among children aged 14-15 years of age, we noted differences by gender with boys reporting punishment more frequently than girls. There was a less sharp distinction in use of corporal punishment between boys and girls in the younger cohort. This may be because corporal punishment is part of the socialisation of younger children, but when they are older it is no longer seen as an appropriate way to discipline young women, while ‘toughening up’ young men maybe normative.

“Reasons” to be punished

Children themselves explain that large class sizes made it difficult for teachers to keep control – for example, if teachers were absent, they were taught by other teachers trying to compensate by managing more than a class at a time. As the number becomes unmanageable, teachers use a stick to control the children, hitting them for a number of reasons.

 

Girls and boys spoke of a range of other reasons for punishment including being absent from school for work, illness, or attending family celebrations, missing classes, not doing their homework, not reading well, making mistakes, getting poor marks in exams, not wearing uniform, not having the right equipment, or not paying the teacher for extra lessons. A girl aged 10 explained:

If we don’t study, they beat us. If we ask other children for help, they beat [us]. I went to drink water without asking sir, so he beat me that time. They said all children should come back to class by the time they count 10 after the interval. But I went home [to use the toilet]. After coming back to school, he beat me.

Boys and girls mentioned going home at lunchtime to use the toilet, as toilets in schools are often  inadequate and unsanitary.

The children also described other forms of punishment.  One 8 year old girl explained that her teacher had asked her to do a goda kurchi (sitting on the edge of the wall by balancing on the legs, a form of punishment widely used in India) and her leg became swollen. Children expressed discontent about both physical and verbal forms. Goda kurchi and verbal abuse was described by one 10 year old boy at a government school:

The teachers beat with sticks and rulers and make us sit on our haunches – our legs swell up. They also abuse us, and use foul language, ‘you look like bullocks and donkeys – the herdsman is better than you’ – this makes us very sad.

The shame and humiliation felt by children when treated like this is clear, and breaches children’s human rights to dignity and respect.

Linking corporal punishment to poverty

Our findings show that poverty at home clearly influenced school discipline practices. Living in poverty meant that children were sometimes not in a position to follow the rules and expectations of school. Children described being punished for not having uniform or the right equipment, or money to pay fees. Anwar, aged 10 said ‘If we don’t get notebooks, then teachers will beat us’.  A boy, aged 15 described how he sometimes missed school:  ‘if uniform is not there [ready], I don’t go because the master will beat me’.

One mother mentioned that the only thing her 7-year old daughter says about school is that teachers beat her:

She studies well, she goes regularly and returns, but when there is no dress [uniform] and when we delay the fee payment then she will not go, she refuses to go. … she says she will not go and she hides behind that wall … and says that ‘sir will beat me, they will beat me’.

 As Young Lives data have shown, economic constraints and family circumstances mean that boys and girls in rural areas engaged in seasonal agricultural work on family land, missed school for days, weeks, or months at a time.  When they did return to school, they faced punishment.  Ramya (girl, aged 12) said: ‘I feel very bad when teacher scolds me. I like to be regular to school, do homework, but I cannot do it all. It is difficult, but I have no choice but to do it’.

Though older boys rarely spoke directly about their fears of punishment, their mothers spoke of their sons’ emotions. Ranadeep’s mother explained:

He liked going to school, but we stop him… Otherwise, we cannot run the family, we don’t get labourers in time and there is no other way for us, so we had to do it like that. When he [returns] teachers, they shout at him and he is terrified…. His father goes there and informs them. … they scold us, they say, how will he get on if he is absent for such a long time?… we try to pacify them by telling them about our problems at home.

What can be done?

Blaming specific groups (teachers, and/or parents) will not enable progress to be made, and risks alienating teachers already under pressure because of overcrowded classrooms, poor infrastructure, and poverty situations.

Approaches need to develop not only from the top down, but from communities, families and teachers upwards, to find ways of working together to change practices.  There is some indication of shifting attitudes because, although corporal punishment is experienced by all social groups, some older children and parents in better-off communities mentioned challenging corporal punishment by teachers. Learning from the ways in which parents and children challenge teachers’ practices could usefully be channelled into community-led strategies to influence attitudes about corporal punishment.

In global policy debates, much emphasis has been placed on the role of education as the solution not only to reducing cycles of poverty in developing countries, but also to addressing gender violence.

However, the evidence presented here suggests that we must question this.

Violence as an integral part of schooling may have consequences for boys’ and girls’ development that go beyond the here-and-now of childhood to social and economic consequences in adulthood, as children experience fear and risks of injury while at school.  In India, this needs to be understood in the context of high expectations that parents and children have of schools, despite the very low levels of learning that children achieve. Some children dislike school for many reasons, but if they discontinue school because of their experience of corporal punishment, and if they learn that the corporal punishment is the solution to behaviour that is out of line, then formal schooling may inadvertently be reinforcing both cycles of poverty and the use of violence.

 

This blog is a summary of Children’s perceptions of punishment in schools in Andhra Pradesh, India by

Virginia Morrow and Renu Singh in  Gender Violence in Poverty Contexts – the educational challenge edited by Jenny Parkes.

Guest blog: 10 Recommendations on how to advance equity for children in the SDGs

gunay salazar photo

Guest post by Günay Salazar, Equity for Children

Equitable societies have to be built; they are not a given. We saw that the Millennium Development Goals Agenda – despite its reported achievements– missed out on the most disadvantaged populations. We know by now who they are: the most vulnerable are often income-poor; ethnic, racial and religious minorities; rural dwellers; environmentally vulnerable communities; and children, especially girls.

The new Approaches to Equity Report highlights key findings on current equity approaches and 10 practical recommendations for policymakers around the globe to create inclusive and equitable societies. (more…)

Do children and young people have a place in International Workers’ Day?

Gina_cropped_lowresBy Gina Crivello, Senior Research Officer

 

May 1st celebrations honouring working people and the working classes tend to be very public displays – whether street parades, rallies or public speeches. Over the past century, the labour movement has advocated for the 8-hour working day and for women’s suffrage, and in more recent years, marches have highlighted the rights of undocumented workers and the views of anti-capitalists.

International Workers’ Day, also known as Labour Day in some places, is about making the rights and voices of workers visible and heard.

But do children and young people have a voice as working people? (more…)

Lighting the way to better policy: measuring child poverty in the SDGs

Child-poverty_indicators_coverBy Paul Dornan, Senior Policy Officer

To achieve the vision for the Sustainable Development Goals set out in the UN Secretary General’s synthesis of the post-2015 discussions,  child poverty needs to be at the core of the new framework. Childhood is the critical period for the development of human faculties. Not only does poverty experienced during childhood have demonstrable damaging life-long consequences, but its impact on children’s health and learning represent a huge waste of human potential in rapidly changing societies. (more…)

Preventing child mortality and addressing ‘the lottery of birth’

The_Lottery_of_Birth_coverby Paul Dornan, Senior Policy Officer, Young Lives

Last year marked the 25th anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The status report on the Convention published by the UN in September noted an incredibly important fact –that under-5 mortality has nearly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. That is 17,000 fewer children dying every day. The pace in reducing early child deaths has quickened – from a 1.2% per annum in 1990–95 to 3.9% in 2005–12.  Of course this is a tremendous success story, but to put it into perspective, the global average of 48 per 1000 compares to 5 per 1000 in the UK and 3 in Sweden, and the MDG goal of a two-thirds reduction will not be met by the 2015 target year.

Last week Save the Children issued a report, The Lottery of Birth, which shines a spotlight on a key part of this story which is that even within national averages, the progress has not been equitable – mortality rates are typically falling least among the poorest and most marginalised children and mortality inequalities within countries are growing. The implication of this is that to make further reductions requires policies to reach the poorest families, where the problem is greatest. (more…)

Reflecting on 2014: 14 things we’ve learned

Paul_web commentBy Paul Dornan, Young Lives Senior Policy Officer

As the year draws to an end, it’s time for a re-run the next instalment of our ‘who’d miss’ series … 12 things we learned in 2012  and the ‘ever popular and long-awaited’ 13 things we learned in 2013. So here are 14 things from 2014… The need for brevity means I’ve had to simplify loads of information into a few lines – so don’t take my word for it all, click the links to find out more.

#1 Children have high hopes and expectations to study for longer to get a good job and future. At the age of 12 years between three-quarters of children in Ethiopia and nine in ten in Peru wanted to go on to vocational training or university after finishing school. Such high hopes often bump up against sharp realities later on, especially for the most marginalised children. But it makes little sense to interpret the reasons for children leaving school early as a lack of understanding of the importance of a good education. (more…)

Reaping the demographic dividend: youth as a second critical window

Paul_web commentBy Paul Dornan, Young Lives Senior Policy Officer

The UNFPA State of the World’s Population has just been published, with the title The Power of the 1.8 Billion: Adolescents, Youth and the Transformation of the future. So what does the report show (beyond the importance of summarising the argument in the title!?)…. The 1.8 billion refers to the number of people aged 10 to 24 years (one in four of the world’s population), of whom nine in ten are growing up in poorer countries.

The report’s main thrust is to identify a potential demographic dividend that is a large young workforce, but one which will reduce as countries experience the demographic transition of falling fertility rates. The report draws on the experience of East Asian countries, highlighting the importance of investing in human capital (we can probably call that education …)  at the same time as countries experienced declining fertility rates. (more…)

Beyond the Girl Summit: creating a legacy of health, education and empowerment

alula photo_YouTube-interview photo_Dec2013

By Alula Pankurst, Ethiopia Country Director, Young Lives

As someone who spends most of my time involved in the nitty-gritty of research, from fieldwork through data analysis to publishing papers and producing policy briefs for consultation with government and other stakeholders, coming to London to attend the Girl Summit was an extraordinary experience. The energy and excitement was palpable and the general enthusiasm especially from vocal young women was infectious. (more…)

What do we know about how children use their time?

Children's time-use in AP_croppedHere’s an interesting question: how do children typically use the 24 hours in their day? It’s a rather basic question – with some important implications.

(1) Where children spend their time tell us something about the space for interventions to reach them. There’s not much point in targeting nutrition programmes through schools if the poorest children are all in the fields.

(2) Time-use information might tell us something about what is likely to matter for children’s well-being since where they spend their time will also determine the friends they make, the activities they take part in, and the risks they may be exposed to. (more…)

‘Life-course‘ perspectives on child poverty

Paul_web commentThe World Health Organization has long been interested in the life-course, recognising that much of the burden of non-communicable disease results from the cumulative impact of factors experienced earlier in life. Reducing the burden of ill-health requires engaging with earlier risk factors. In line with more academic ways of looking at life-course studies, the WHO approach has also recognised the wider social context in which people lives their lives, emphasising the social determinants of health.

Policy debates have increasingly engaged with the potential of life-course analysis to improve children’s outcomes, and while most of the attention (although not really spending) focuses on the early years as a key foundational stage, it highlights the importance of those critical moments in children’s lives which must not be missed. Increasingly attention is being drawn to changes and transitions happening during adolescence. What then does a life-course approach offer to concerns about reducing the impact of child poverty? (more…)